Effect size
The smallest difference or relationship that would matter in the real world.
Explore how sample size, effect size, and uncertainty work together—before you collect the data.
You need 128 participants total to have an 80% chance of detecting a medium-sized difference.
The honest part: This result is only as credible as your expected effect. Use prior evidence or the smallest effect worth detecting—not a convenient guess.
A non-significant replication cannot show that an effect is absent. Size a two-group replication so an equivalence test against a bound you justify has a stated chance of succeeding.
Open the replication planner Free, exact TOST power. You choose and justify the bound.Compare retention or persistence targets with a conditional outcome band. See how cohort size and an assumed improvement affect the range of possible results.
Explore the target-band calculator Free scenario planning. An assumed improvement is not evidence of achievability.Fewer questions can reduce respondent burden. Explore how hypothetical short forms change measurement precision, statistical power, and the sample size your study may need.
Explore the short-form simulator Free, browser-based, and clearly labeled as an illustrative planning model.80% is a common minimum; 90% may be more appropriate when missing a meaningful effect would be especially costly. The choice should be justified for the study, not selected automatically.
Use prior evidence or the smallest effect that would matter in practice. Avoid choosing an effect merely because it produces a feasible sample size. Read the guide to choosing an effect size →
Observed post-hoc power adds little beyond the p-value. After data collection, confidence intervals and the range of effects compatible with the data are usually more informative.
Use a design-specific analysis for clustering, repeated measures, unequal allocation, attrition, multiple primary outcomes, non-inferiority, or other structures not represented by this calculator.
Power analysis connects the signal you care about to the evidence your study can realistically produce.
The smallest difference or relationship that would matter in the real world.
How many independent observations your design needs—not simply how many are available.
Your tolerated false-positive rate. Lower alpha demands stronger evidence.
Your chance of detecting the effect if it truly exists. It equals 1 − β.
StatPower computes t-test power with the exact noncentral t distribution, the method used by R and G*Power, and uses Fisher’s z for correlations and Cohen’s arcsine approximation for proportions. t-test and proportion results match R’s pwr package exactly. It is most useful before data collection, paired with a justified effect size and an analysis plan that matches your design.
Clusters, repeated measures, attrition, multiple outcomes, or uncertain effect sizes can change the answer substantially. Get a design review from DASS before the study is locked.
Preparing a grant? DASS can join the proposal team as a statistical methodologist for study design, power analysis, and analysis planning. When sponsor and institutional rules allow, our fees can be included in the proposal budget.
Discuss your grant